Calgary · development permit
DP2014-4669
NEW: MULTI-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (16 BUILDINGS, 106 UNITS)
What this status means
Cancelled. The file was cancelled, or a granted permit was revoked.
Calgary publishes this as “Cancelled”, which it uses to mean: The file was cancelled, commonly withdrawn by the applicant.
Record as published
| Field | Value as published |
|---|---|
| File number | DP2014-4669 |
| Application type | not published |
| Category | Residential - Multi-Family |
| Description | NEW: MULTI-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (16 BUILDINGS, 106 UNITS) |
| Status | Cancelled |
| Applied | 2014-09-29 |
| Decision | Approval |
| Decided by | Development Authority |
| Decision date | 2016-03-17 |
| Issued / released | not published |
| Must commence by | 2018-03-17 |
| Cancelled / refused date | 2018-01-11 |
| Appeal number | SDAB2016-0027 |
| Appeal hearing | 1970-08-22 |
| Appeal decision | Appeal Withdrawn - Application Approved |
| Address | 12313 52 ST NE |
| Community | REDSTONE |
| Ward | 3 |
| Land use district | M-1 |
| District description | Multi-Residential - Low Profile |
| Proposed district | not published |
| Cross-references | not published |
Blank rows mean the municipality does not publish that field for this record — not that the value is zero or unknown to the City.
This record comes from the full archive
The municipal record above is complete and unedited. What is thinner is everything this platform builds around it: project grouping, party links and generated briefs are computed for the most recent twelve months, so they are absent here rather than empty. The filing itself, its status, its dates and its evidence are exactly as acquired.
Site locations
The City publishes 1 location on this file. A development site is frequently several titled parcels, and collapsing them to one address would lose the site.
| Address | Type | Coordinates |
|---|---|---|
| 12313 52 ST NE | Titled Parcel | 51.16756, -113.96226 |
Established facts
8 facts derived from this record. Open any one to see the field, method, confidence and official record behind it.
| Fact | Value | Evidence | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset class | multi residential | D · inferred | 8600% |
| Land use district | M-1 | A · official field | 10000% |
| Buildings proposed | 16 buildings | B · official text | 9000% |
| Dwelling units proposed | 106 units | B · official text | 9000% |
| Proposed use | MULTI-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT | A · official field | 10000% |
| Parcels and buildings on the site | 1 locations | A · official field | 10000% |
| Permitted or discretionary use | Discretionary | A · official field | 10000% |
| Type of work | new | B · official text | 9500% |
Asset class: multi residential
- Evidence
- D · inferred confidence 8600%
- How established
- Matched against a published vocabulary
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- category+proposedusedescription+description
- Value as published
- MULTI-RESIDENTIAL
- Observed
- 2026-09-02
- Produced by
- extraction@1.0.0
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Land use district: M-1
- Evidence
- A · official field confidence 10000%
- How established
- Published by the authority in a structured field
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- landusedistrict
- Value as published
- M-1
- Observed
- 2026-09-02
- Produced by
- connector@calgary-dp
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Buildings proposed: 16 buildings
- Evidence
- B · official text confidence 9000%
- How established
- Parsed from official text by a deterministic rule
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- description
- Value as published
- 16 BUILDINGS
- Observed
- 2026-09-02
- Produced by
- extraction@1.0.0
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Dwelling units proposed: 106 units
- Evidence
- B · official text confidence 9000%
- How established
- Parsed from official text by a deterministic rule
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- description
- Value as published
- 106 UNITS
- Observed
- 2026-09-02
- Produced by
- extraction@1.0.0
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Proposed use: MULTI-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
- Evidence
- A · official field confidence 10000%
- How established
- Published by the authority in a structured field
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- proposedusedescription
- Value as published
- MULTI-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
- Observed
- 2026-09-02
- Produced by
- connector@calgary-dp
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Parcels and buildings on the site: 1 locations
- Evidence
- A · official field confidence 10000%
- How established
- Published by the authority in a structured field
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- locationcount
- Value as published
- 1
- Observed
- 2026-09-02
- Produced by
- connector@calgary-dp
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Permitted or discretionary use: Discretionary
- Evidence
- A · official field confidence 10000%
- How established
- Published by the authority in a structured field
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- permitteddiscretionary
- Value as published
- Discretionary
- Observed
- 2026-09-02
- Produced by
- connector@calgary-dp
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Type of work: new
- Evidence
- B · official text confidence 9500%
- How established
- Parsed from official text by a deterministic rule
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- description
- Value as published
- NEW
- Observed
- 2026-09-02
- Produced by
- extraction@1.0.0
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Record history
First acquired 2026-08-31 and last confirmed still published on 2026-09-02. The municipality has not changed any tracked field on this file in that time — this platform compares content hashes on every poll, so an unchanged record produces no version and no event.
Questions about DP2014-4669
Answered from this filing's published fields. Every sentence describes the application, not a building.
- What is DP2014-4669?
- DP2014-4669 is a development permit filed with the City of Calgary at 12313 52 ST NE. The City describes it as: "NEW: MULTI-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (16 BUILDINGS, 106 UNITS)". It is a municipal filing — a record of what was put to the City, not a record of what was built.
- Has DP2014-4669 been approved?
- The City of Calgary publishes the status of DP2014-4669 as "Cancelled". The file was cancelled, commonly withdrawn by the applicant. A filing's status describes the application, not construction: an approved application is not a building, and an issued permit is not proof that work began.
- When was DP2014-4669 applied for?
- DP2014-4669 carries an application date of 2014-09-29 on the City of Calgary's published record, with a decision recorded 2016-03-17.
- What else has been filed at 12313 52 ST NE?
- 4 municipal filings are recorded at 12313 52 ST NE, including DP2014-4669. Multiple filings at one address are normal — a development permit and its building permits are separate applications — and do not indicate multiple buildings.
Attribution
Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence – City of Calgary. Read the licence
This platform is not affiliated with or endorsed by any municipality.
Official record
Open DP2014-4669 at the municipality ↗
- Source
- Development Permits
- Licence
- Open Government Licence – City of Calgary v2.1
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Documents
- Link and cite only
- Updated
- Daily. Observed data_updated_at 2026-08-28T21:10:37Z at review.
Supporting documents
None are hosted here, and this is a rights decision rather than a gap in the pipeline. Calgary’s open data publishes no document URLs at all; the drawings and studies live in the City’s own map viewer and are largely authored by the applicant, which places them outside the licence’s grant.
View at the City ↗Parties
No party is named on this record.
Something wrong?
The municipality’s record is authoritative. If this page disagrees with it, or names someone it should not, tell us.
Report an error