An independent research product · not a municipal serviceData licensed from Canadian municipalities · source registry

Measures

Indexes

Named, versioned measures computed from Canadian municipal development records. Each carries its formula, the numeric rule deciding who qualifies, and the municipalities it leaves out with the figure they missed by. Cite them by name and version.

Our analysisThese indexes are this platform's own constructions, computed from published municipal fields. No municipality publishes or endorses them.

Filing Momentum Index (FMI) v1.0

Our analysisIndex, 2015 = 100

Each municipality's annual development permit filings indexed to its own 2015 total at 100, so a city is compared with its own past rather than with a larger or smaller city.

Filing Momentum Index standings, Index, 2015 = 100
MunicipalityFMI2015 filings2025 filingsChange
Calgary131.41,5001,971+31%
Edmonton101.01,6641,680+1%

Not included: Ottawa — see the method page for the threshold each missed.

Method, limits and full series →

Record Completeness Index (RCI) v1.0

Our analysisPercent of core fields populated

The share of 8 core fields populated across a municipality's development permit records, averaged. It measures what a dataset supports, not how a municipality performs.

Record Completeness Index standings, Percent of core fields populated
MunicipalityRCIApplication dateDecision dateStatusDescriptionAddressCoordinatesLand use districtApplication category
Calgary95.8100%86.3%100%99.9%100%99.6%100%80.5%
Edmonton83.773.7%0%100%98.2%99.9%100%99.9%97.8%
Ottawa75.0100%0%100%100%100%100%0%100%

Method, limits and full series →

What these indexes are not

Our analysisStated once, and repeated on every index page, because a number travels further than its context.
  • Not a rating of any municipality. They measure published records. A city may hold a field internally and not publish it, and nothing here can see that.
  • Not a rating of any development. No index scores, ranks or grades an individual application, project, site or firm. They operate on aggregates only.
  • Not per-capita. Population has not been ingested, so a city is only ever compared with its own past — never with another city’s level.
  • Not a forecast. Every value describes filings already recorded.