Calgary · rezoning
LOC2009-0074
Land Use Amendment - to accommodate Place of Worship
What this status means
Approved. The authority approved the application. Approval is not a permit and not construction.
Calgary publishes this as “Approved”, which it uses to mean: Council approved the land use redesignation bylaw.
Record as published
| Field | Value as published |
|---|---|
| File number | LOC2009-0074 |
| Application type | LU / OP / Closure (LOC) |
| Category | Land Use Redesignation |
| Description | Land Use Amendment - to accommodate Place of Worship |
| Status | Approved |
| Applied | 2009-08-07 |
| Decision | not published |
| Decided by | not published |
| Decision date | not published |
| Issued / released | not published |
| Must commence by | not published |
| Cancelled / refused date | not published |
| Appeal number | not published |
| Appeal hearing | not published |
| Appeal decision | not published |
| Address | 81 ROYAL ELM DR NW |
| Community | not published |
| Ward | not published |
| Land use district | DC/PS |
| District description | not published |
| Proposed district | S-CI |
| Cross-references | not published |
Blank rows mean the municipality does not publish that field for this record — not that the value is zero or unknown to the City.
This record comes from the full archive
The municipal record above is complete and unedited. What is thinner is everything this platform builds around it: project grouping, party links and generated briefs are computed for the most recent twelve months, so they are absent here rather than empty. The filing itself, its status, its dates and its evidence are exactly as acquired.
Site locations
The City publishes 1 location on this file. A development site is frequently several titled parcels, and collapsing them to one address would lose the site.
| Address | Type | Coordinates |
|---|---|---|
| 81 ROYAL ELM DR NW | Titled Parcel | 51.14060, -114.23109 |
Established facts
4 facts derived from this record. Open any one to see the field, method, confidence and official record behind it.
| Fact | Value | Evidence | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset class | institutional | D · inferred | 5600% |
| Existing land use district | DC/PS | A · official field | 10000% |
| Proposed land use district | S-CI | A · official field | 10000% |
| Redesignation | DC/PS → S-CI | C · derived | 10000% |
Asset class: institutional
- Evidence
- D · inferred confidence 5600%
- How established
- Matched against a published vocabulary
- Source
- Land Use Redesignation Applications
- Source field
- description+proposedlud
- Value as published
- Place of Worship | Redesignation
- Observed
- 2026-09-02
- Produced by
- extraction@1.0.0
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Existing land use district: DC/PS
- Evidence
- A · official field confidence 10000%
- How established
- Published by the authority in a structured field
- Source
- Land Use Redesignation Applications
- Source field
- fromlud
- Value as published
- DC/PS
- Observed
- 2026-09-02
- Produced by
- connector@calgary-loc
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Proposed land use district: S-CI
- Evidence
- A · official field confidence 10000%
- How established
- Published by the authority in a structured field
- Source
- Land Use Redesignation Applications
- Source field
- proposedlud
- Value as published
- S-CI
- Observed
- 2026-09-02
- Produced by
- connector@calgary-loc
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Redesignation: DC/PS → S-CI
- Evidence
- C · derived confidence 10000%
- How established
- Calculated from other official values
- Source
- Land Use Redesignation Applications
- Source field
- fromlud+proposedlud
- Value as published
- DC/PS → S-CI
- Observed
- 2026-09-02
- Produced by
- extraction@1.0.0
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Record history
First acquired 2026-08-31 and last confirmed still published on 2026-09-02. The municipality has not changed any tracked field on this file in that time — this platform compares content hashes on every poll, so an unchanged record produces no version and no event.
Questions about LOC2009-0074
Answered from this filing's published fields. Every sentence describes the application, not a building.
- What is LOC2009-0074?
- LOC2009-0074 is a rezoning filed with the City of Calgary at 81 ROYAL ELM DR NW. The City describes it as: "Land Use Amendment - to accommodate Place of Worship". It is a municipal filing — a record of what was put to the City, not a record of what was built.
- Has LOC2009-0074 been approved?
- The City of Calgary publishes the status of LOC2009-0074 as "Approved". Council approved the land use redesignation bylaw. A filing's status describes the application, not construction: an approved application is not a building, and an issued permit is not proof that work began.
- When was LOC2009-0074 applied for?
- LOC2009-0074 carries an application date of 2009-08-07 on the City of Calgary's published record. No decision date is published.
- What else has been filed at 81 ROYAL ELM DR NW?
- 10 municipal filings are recorded at 81 ROYAL ELM DR NW, including LOC2009-0074. Multiple filings at one address are normal — a development permit and its building permits are separate applications — and do not indicate multiple buildings.
Attribution
Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence – City of Calgary. Read the licence
This platform is not affiliated with or endorsed by any municipality.
Official record
Open LOC2009-0074 at the municipality ↗
- Source
- Land Use Redesignation Applications
- Licence
- Open Government Licence – City of Calgary v2.1
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Documents
- Link and cite only
- Updated
- Daily. Observed data_updated_at 2026-08-28T21:09:08Z at review.
Supporting documents
None are hosted here, and this is a rights decision rather than a gap in the pipeline. Calgary’s open data publishes no document URLs at all; the drawings and studies live in the City’s own map viewer and are largely authored by the applicant, which places them outside the licence’s grant.
View at the City ↗Parties
No party is named on this record.
Something wrong?
The municipality’s record is authoritative. If this page disagrees with it, or names someone it should not, tell us.
Report an error