Calgary · Multi-residential · project dossier
Multi-Residential Development — 236 NEW BRIGHTON RO SE
NEW: MULTI-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (9 PHASES, 29 BUILDINGS, 188 UNITS), COMMUNITY ENTRANCE FEATURE
What the record establishes
Each value below opens to show the municipal field it came from, how it was established, and a link to the City’s own record. Nothing here is inferred without saying so.
| Fact | Value | Evidence | Source field |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dwelling units proposed | 188 units | B · official text | description |
| Buildings proposed | 29 buildings | B · official text | description |
| Phases proposed | 9 phases | B · official text | description |
| Proposed use | MULTI-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT | A · official field | proposedusedescription |
| Land use district | M-1 | A · official field | landusedistrict |
| Parcels and buildings on the site | 190 locations | A · official field | locationcount |
Municipal files
Every official file kept intact, with the municipality’s own status wording and the evidence that attached it to this project.
Some filings are outside the browsable slice
This project links 29 municipal files in the full corpus; 1 of them are browsable here. The remainder are older or lower-scoring filings — typically unit-level building permits — held in the full dataset rather than the compiled slice. The coverage atlas explains the boundary.
| File | Layer | Municipal status | Applied | Linked by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DP2010-3554 | development permit | “Released” → Permit issued | 2010-09-03 | Seed file for this project |
Project timeline
- DP2010-3554 fileddevelopment permit application received by the municipality.
- DP2010-3554 decidedDecision recorded: Approval (Development Authority).
- DP2010-3554 issuedDevelopment permit released after the appeal period. Not a construction milestone.
- DP2010-3554 must commence byThe permit lapses if the development has not commenced by this date.
How these records were linked
A municipality files permits, not projects. Calgary publishes a cross-reference field that would state the link directly — concurrent_loc — but it is populated on 121 of 192,471 development permits and appears abandoned after 2021. So the join is made from what the records do share: a normalized address, and coordinates within a tolerance. Every join below shows the rule that made it and how strongly.
| File | Joined by | Evidence | Class | Confidence |
|---|
Confidence is the strongest single signal, not a sum of weak ones. Four weak matches do not add up to a strong one: a join also requires at least one signal at 0.6 or above, because combining four 0.3 signals under noisy-OR reaches 0.76 and would have merged unrelated filings. If a join here is wrong, tell us — splitting a project is a review action, not an automatic one.
All evidence
9 facts recorded across 1 file.
Dwelling units proposed: 188 units
- Evidence
- B · official text confidence 90%
- How established
- Parsed from official text by a deterministic rule
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- description
- Value as published
- 188 UNITS
- Observed
- 2026-08-31
- Produced by
- extraction@1.0.0
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Buildings proposed: 29 buildings
- Evidence
- B · official text confidence 90%
- How established
- Parsed from official text by a deterministic rule
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- description
- Value as published
- 29 BUILDINGS
- Observed
- 2026-08-31
- Produced by
- extraction@1.0.0
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Phases proposed: 9 phases
- Evidence
- B · official text confidence 90%
- How established
- Parsed from official text by a deterministic rule
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- description
- Value as published
- 9 PHASES
- Observed
- 2026-08-31
- Produced by
- extraction@1.0.0
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Proposed use: MULTI-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
- Evidence
- A · official field confidence 100%
- How established
- Published by the authority in a structured field
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- proposedusedescription
- Value as published
- MULTI-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
- Observed
- 2026-08-31
- Produced by
- connector@calgary-dp
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Land use district: M-1
- Evidence
- A · official field confidence 100%
- How established
- Published by the authority in a structured field
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- landusedistrict
- Value as published
- M-1
- Observed
- 2026-08-31
- Produced by
- connector@calgary-dp
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Parcels and buildings on the site: 190 locations
- Evidence
- A · official field confidence 100%
- How established
- Published by the authority in a structured field
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- locationcount
- Value as published
- 190
- Observed
- 2026-08-31
- Produced by
- connector@calgary-dp
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Permitted or discretionary use: Discretionary
- Evidence
- A · official field confidence 100%
- How established
- Published by the authority in a structured field
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- permitteddiscretionary
- Value as published
- Discretionary
- Observed
- 2026-08-31
- Produced by
- connector@calgary-dp
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Type of work: new
- Evidence
- B · official text confidence 95%
- How established
- Parsed from official text by a deterministic rule
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- description
- Value as published
- NEW
- Observed
- 2026-08-31
- Produced by
- extraction@1.0.0
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Asset class: multi residential
- Evidence
- D · inferred confidence 86%
- How established
- Matched against a published vocabulary
- Source
- Development Permits
- Source field
- category+proposedusedescription+description
- Value as published
- MULTI-RESIDENTIAL
- Observed
- 2026-08-31
- Produced by
- extraction@1.0.0
- Rights
- Licensed with conditions
- Official record
- Open at the municipality
Attribution
Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence – City of Calgary. Read the licence
This platform is not affiliated with or endorsed by any municipality.
- Dwelling units proposed
- 188 unitsdescription · class B
- Buildings proposed
- 29 buildingsdescription · class B
- Phases proposed
- 9 phasesdescription · class B
- Proposed use
- MULTI-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTproposedusedescription · class A
- Land use district
- M-1landusedistrict · class A
- Parcels and buildings on the site
- 190 locationslocationcount · class A
- Municipal files
- 29joined by this platform
- Addresses on file
- 189locationaddresses
Site
- Primary address
- 236 NEW BRIGHTON RO SE
- Municipality
- Calgary
- Community
- NEW BRIGHTON
- Ward
- 12
- Coordinates
- 50.92759, -113.95660
- Addresses
- 189
40 of 189 addresses
- 120 NEW BRIGHTON LD SE
- 236 NEW BRIGHTON RO SE
- 224 NEW BRIGHTON RO SE
- 61 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 34 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 48 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 152 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 45 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 218 NEW BRIGHTON RO SE
- 175 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 81 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 260 NEW BRIGHTON RO SE
- 254 NEW BRIGHTON RO SE
- 252 NEW BRIGHTON RO SE
- 225 NEW BRIGHTON RO SE
- 238 NEW BRIGHTON RO SE
- 63 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 231 NEW BRIGHTON RO SE
- 66 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 76 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 8 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 78 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 100 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 102 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 124 NEW BRIGHTON LD SE
- 116 NEW BRIGHTON LD SE
- 104 NEW BRIGHTON LD SE
- 149 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 28 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 10 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 94 NEW BRIGHTON LD SE
- 20 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 104 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 26 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 40 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 24 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 44 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 88 NEW BRIGHTON LD SE
- 31 NEW BRIGHTON PT SE
- 82 NEW BRIGHTON LD SE
Showing 40 of 189. The full list is in the municipal record.
Parties
- CLEM LAU ARCHITECTS & DESIGNERSapplicant · field applicant
The applicant is the party that filed. In Calgary that is usually the architect, surveyor or a permit agent — not the owner and not the developer, neither of which any source field states.
Official records
The municipality’s record is authoritative. Where this page and the City disagree, the City is right — please tell us.
Watch this site
Get told when a file here changes status, is decided, appealed or permitted.
Create a watch